<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Ostrow Off The Record - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-8a003157" type="application/json"/><link>http://ostrowofftherecord.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://ostrowofftherecord.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 10:58:50 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: CBS adds four series, redraws fall schedule</title><link>http://blogs.denverpost.com/ostrow/2012/05/16/cbs-adds-four-series-redraws-schedule/8870/#comment-530325976</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Uh, Two Broke Girls has always been on Mondays but it is currently after How I Met Your Mother so it is a half hour later. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tv</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 10:58:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Updates: renewals of your favorite shows</title><link>http://blogs.denverpost.com/ostrow/2012/05/11/updates-renewals-favorite-shows/8755/#comment-526958286</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What in the world is going on with this story?  "Up All Night" is an NBC show, not ABC.  "Community" got a 13-episode order and "Parks and Recreation" got a full season:  22 episodes.  That's information that was readily available from any number of media sites.&lt;br&gt;Why should anyone trust the Post for even the most basic information anymore? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A.S.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 22:58:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Denver women featured on HDNet&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;Dan Rather Reports&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://blogs.denverpost.com/ostrow/2012/04/30/denver-women-featured-hdnets-dan-reports/8632/#comment-523197226</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for helping to bring this story to public light. Though there are many reasons why adoption is necessary and beneficial, this period of history is intimately linked to the shame and secrecy that drove laws still on the books today which deny adult adoptees access to their birth identity.  Truth and transparency in adoption helps reduce shame, corruption and damaging practices such as what these women had to endure.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rich Uhrlaub</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 14:34:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Denver women featured on HDNet&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;Dan Rather Reports&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://blogs.denverpost.com/ostrow/2012/04/30/denver-women-featured-hdnets-dan-reports/8632/#comment-517918243</link><description>&lt;p&gt;how about the continuing practice of social services selling babies! why not touch on that subject, since it's STILL going on, and STILL affecting families! ESPECIALLY in boulder county colorado, but all over the states as well&amp;gt; Social services is ripping babies away form families to place adoption orders from rich people who can't have babies of their own, and it's WRONG! I did NOT give birth to 2 wonderful boys just to give them to someone rich!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karen Glammeyer Medcoff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 14:52:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mountain West pulls the plug on its Sports Network</title><link>http://blogs.denverpost.com/ostrow/2012/05/01/directv-pulls-plug-mtn-sports-network/8652/#comment-517859259</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Fixed, thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wenzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 13:37:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mountain West pulls the plug on its Sports Network</title><link>http://blogs.denverpost.com/ostrow/2012/05/01/directv-pulls-plug-mtn-sports-network/8652/#comment-516808737</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Let me get this straight.  The headline says "DIRECTV pulls the plug on the Mountain West Sports Network" and in the blog entry it clearly says according to DIRECTV that the channel will not be available from ANY television provider.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So explain to us how this is DIRECTV pulling the plug and not the Mountain West Network simply going away for good?  Incredibly misleading headline. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Frisco Kid</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 12:34:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mountain West pulls the plug on its Sports Network</title><link>http://blogs.denverpost.com/ostrow/2012/05/01/directv-pulls-plug-mtn-sports-network/8652/#comment-516715037</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here is a copy of the message sent by DirecTV to its subscribers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;"Dear Valued Customer,   Thank you for being a loyal DIRECTV customer. We appreciate your business  and would like to provide an important update regarding your DIRECTV®programming. Effective May 31, 2012, The Mtn. Network (Ch. 616), a sports network that  broadcasts Mountain West Conference collegiate sports, will cease  operations and end the broadcasting of their channel. This means the  channel will not be available from any television provider, including  DIRECTV and its competitors. "&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As you see, the broadcast network ceased operations.  It was not a unilateral decision by DirecTV to eliminate the channel.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Galt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 10:48:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mountain West pulls the plug on its Sports Network</title><link>http://blogs.denverpost.com/ostrow/2012/05/01/directv-pulls-plug-mtn-sports-network/8652/#comment-515804549</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bad headline. DirecTV did not "pull the plug."  The network ceased operations.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A.S.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 22:56:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oscar night Red carpet snark &amp;#8212; join us!</title><link>http://blogs.denverpost.com/ostrow/2012/02/26/oscar-night-red-carpet-snark-join-us/7755/#comment-514794166</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Its very nice Denver post the staff for entertainment but some time mishapped can be happened .Like feet stuck &lt;br&gt;on the carpet and we fall down or injured the body.firstly get&lt;br&gt;a proper treatment and we&lt;br&gt;also meet a lawyer.He&lt;br&gt;give a suggest .&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;	&lt;br&gt;	&lt;br&gt;	&lt;br&gt;	&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fell down wet stair</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 04:06:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jeremy-Jojola-9News</title><link>http://blogs.denverpost.com/ostrow/2012/04/26/jeremy-jojola-waves-a-banner-for-9news/8610/110930023845_jeremy-jojola/#comment-511779578</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your story last night did not tell the whole story about all Labor Unions. They are not all the same. You tried to balance your story by talking to a contractors association, which of course is going to slam Unions as well. You should have done your homework and talked to other Labor Unions whose leaders work long hours to try to help their members by negotiating with contractors ,who play by the rules, to earn a living wage with benefits. When this is accomplished it not only helps our members but the non-union sector as well by keeping wages competitive without a race to the bottom which is what is currently going on. By saying THE UNION, you gave a lot of very hard working people a 'Black Eye'. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mwilliams</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:17:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Judge Judy&amp;#8221; hears a Denver case</title><link>http://blogs.denverpost.com/ostrow/2012/04/25/judge-judy-hears-denver-case/8597/#comment-510088307</link><description>&lt;p&gt; But don't you love watching her take down a hapless moron?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Wenzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:51:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Judge Judy&amp;#8221; hears a Denver case</title><link>http://blogs.denverpost.com/ostrow/2012/04/25/judge-judy-hears-denver-case/8597/#comment-509502589</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Man, Judge Judy is a bitch. Regardless of your reason for being in her court you can and will be treated very poorly. She is so very nasty that, manytimes,  she fails to hear what her "victims" are talking about. Many times her show demonstrates a serious miscarriage of justice. By the way, I watch it every day.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Glacierltg2003</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 03:12:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunday night TV logjam: &amp;#8220;Mad Men,&amp;#8221; &amp;#8220;The Good Wife,&amp;#8221; &amp;#8220;Game of Thrones,&amp;#8221; &amp;#8220;The Killing&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://blogs.denverpost.com/ostrow/2012/04/16/sunday-night/8438/#comment-499751024</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes The Killing is very slow paced, but still so watchable.  Amazing cast.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yorkies5</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 08:41:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jamie White returns to Denver&amp;#8217;s Alice in the morning</title><link>http://blogs.denverpost.com/ostrow/2012/01/05/jamie-white-returns-to-denvers-alice-in-the-morning/7235/#comment-493416380</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jamie, why did you leave Sacramento??  We miss you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jackl1709</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:09:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Keith Olbermann, fired from Current TV, tells all to David Letterman</title><link>http://blogs.denverpost.com/ostrow/2012/04/03/olbermann-fired-current-tv-tells-letterman/8289/#comment-485186834</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yep, Keith WAS the bright light, the classy chandelier if you will, at CurrentTV. And they turned out the light.  Hey, when they say “Keith, you’re gonna be half-partner at Current” and they offer you 10 million a year, it implies that you’ll have SOME control over your work environment, your new home... no? Ahhhhh yes ....but of course....excuse me, I forgot : For we must contrast those nasty angry egotistic Liberal commentators (like Keith Olbermann) with…..the quiet, humble, self-effacing, ego-less, almost Budda-like qualities of Conservative commentators…..who, no doubt, bicycle to work, so that they might not offend THEIR limo drivers. Chill out Right Wingers, and just take two (more) Viagras. But do me a favor- and DON’T call me in the morning.  :-) The REAL question we should be asking is : Did CurrentTV simply USE Keith to gain attention and higher ratings? They KNEW what they were getting! Did they lure him with big bucks, and then drop him when they were done? Yes, we all know that Keith injects emotion and passion into his commentary, into his intelligent and incisive reporting, and into his humor….all of which makes his program interesting, as well as informative. He’s forceful, honest, and direct: you FEEL his pain, you FEEL his anger, and you FEEL his heart-felt sincerity when he covers a story. And he covers it well. He’s NEVER just another talking head! If Keith is absent from CurrentTV, then I too will be absent from CurrentTV. For Keith is one of the best – hands down- as evidenced by his outstanding coverage of OWS during the past year. I wish him well, and hope that he is back on the air soon. We need his unique voice and viewpoint!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stan chaz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 22:22:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rick Barber signs off KOA&amp;#8217;s overnight shift</title><link>http://blogs.denverpost.com/ostrow/2012/01/05/rick-barber-signs-off-koas-overnight-shift/7258/#comment-484901050</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Coast to Coast is a poor substitute. Can't even listen to it as it is so ridulous. Good show for Boy Scout campfires.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bob</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 16:10:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Morning Glories: Katie Couric, Ryan Seacrest, Sarah Palin and Kyle Dyer</title><link>http://blogs.denverpost.com/ostrow/2012/04/01/morning-glories/8256/#comment-483556648</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The movie "Game Change" was fictional and you won't see Palin campaigning for flip-flopping Romney. I am surprised she's walking into the Marxist den on Tuesday, for they could care less either way.   &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JDCampbell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 10:26:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jamie White returns to Denver&amp;#8217;s Alice in the morning</title><link>http://blogs.denverpost.com/ostrow/2012/01/05/jamie-white-returns-to-denvers-alice-in-the-morning/7235/#comment-477896821</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jamie is terrible. She adds nothing to the show, very annoying to listen to.  I don't bother with show any more its awful! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Td_bailey</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:35:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Starz offers a free &amp;#8220;sneak&amp;#8221; episode of &amp;#8220;Magic City&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://blogs.denverpost.com/ostrow/2012/03/19/starz-offers-free-magic-city-previews-episodes/8152/#comment-476540196</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm surprise that Starz  renewed Magic City even before the pilot episode was aired. I hope their confidence for the series will be paid off. Watching the trailers, this series is quite intriguing. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Magic City</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:01:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comcast Xfinity makes &amp;#8220;Mad Men&amp;#8221; episodes available free; Showtime, Starz offers, too</title><link>http://blogs.denverpost.com/ostrow/2012/03/21/comcast-xfinity-mad-men-episodes/8230/#comment-473504194</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't let Comcast's so-called "On Demand" be your deciding factor for using Comcast (aka XFinity). The "free movies are generally at least 20 years old (unless you are a big fan of the FEAR network). As far as television series, to see any of TNT's series "on demand", you must pay a separate subscription (there are "free" movie channels - like FX - which also require a subscription), and network shows are a joke: popular series like "Unforgettable", "Criminal Minds" and current season episodes of "The Mentalist" (TNT offers episodes in syndication - for a fee) are just a few of the shows not in the series "on demand" - however if you miss "Angel", "Men of a Certain Age", "Everybody Loves Raymond" (just a few of the canceled series you can watch) - or any number of the "reality shows" it might be for you!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mary</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 07:22:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Public radio&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;This American Life&amp;#8221; pulls Chinese Apple factory story</title><link>http://blogs.denverpost.com/ostrow/2012/03/16/public-radios-american-life-pulls-chinese-apple-factory-story/8116/#comment-468318350</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your distaste for the liberal ideology is evident. While that's indeed yours, don't confuse legitimate reporting with differences in outlook. I get my news from a wide variety of sources; in addition to NPR, I listen to the BBC, CNBC, MSNBC, FOX and a variety of on-line journals. Consistently, FOX stands out as one that regularly reports marginal stories having a ideological ax to grind and when they do miss the boat, they don't retract. That works for you and a lot of other folks, but don't fall into the the trap it's all the "libs" which is a very tired and dated argument. BTW - NPR is remains a middle of the road, objective news source - they've covered the recent GOP presidential primary race in depth and without favoritism. You wouldn't know that as you don't listen.   &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Max</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 08:57:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Public radio&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;This American Life&amp;#8221; pulls Chinese Apple factory story</title><link>http://blogs.denverpost.com/ostrow/2012/03/16/public-radios-american-life-pulls-chinese-apple-factory-story/8116/#comment-468095493</link><description>&lt;p&gt;perhaps they should check their facts before airing provocative stories.  But libs - and NPR is very liberal - likes to report first and retract later.  Business as usual for them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pistolpete44us</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 21:27:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Public radio&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;This American Life&amp;#8221; pulls Chinese Apple factory story</title><link>http://blogs.denverpost.com/ostrow/2012/03/16/public-radios-american-life-pulls-chinese-apple-factory-story/8116/#comment-468028760</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You mean unlike your RW hate radio, Fox etc that spout hate and falsehoods 24/7. NPR isn't liberal, it's just that wingers like you think anything that isn't RW hate radio and TV is liberal. Sorry, no one else but you wingers think that is true.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrewm</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 19:00:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Public radio&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;This American Life&amp;#8221; pulls Chinese Apple factory story</title><link>http://blogs.denverpost.com/ostrow/2012/03/16/public-radios-american-life-pulls-chinese-apple-factory-story/8116/#comment-468027530</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Much higher standards than the idiot standard of your Fox.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrewm</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 18:58:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Public radio&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;This American Life&amp;#8221; pulls Chinese Apple factory story</title><link>http://blogs.denverpost.com/ostrow/2012/03/16/public-radios-american-life-pulls-chinese-apple-factory-story/8116/#comment-468026848</link><description>&lt;p&gt; So when Fox airs a false story, which they do almost every minute, they'd have to go off the air permanently to retract all the falsehoods.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anything that doesn't come from a RW source to you is 'liberal' which means your comment has zero credibility.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrewm</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 18:57:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
